Comparisons
ExpressVPN vs Surfshark 2025: Speed Test Battle
Head-to-head speed comparison between ExpressVPN and Surfshark. We test both services across multiple server locations to determine the speed champion.
Blog Admin
October 17, 2025
12 min read
25 views
# ExpressVPN vs Surfshark 2025: Speed Test Battle
When choosing a VPN, speed is often the deciding factor. We conducted extensive speed tests comparing ExpressVPN and Surfshark across multiple server locations, protocols, and times of day to determine which service offers superior performance.
## Testing Methodology
### Test Setup
- **Base Connection:** 1 Gbps fiber (940 Mbps actual)
- **Test Duration:** 30 days of daily testing
- **Test Times:** Peak (8-10 PM) and off-peak (2-4 AM)
- **Protocols Tested:** OpenVPN, WireGuard/NordLynx, IKEv2
- **Locations:** US, UK, Canada, Australia, Japan, Germany
### Speed Test Tools
- **Primary:** Speedtest.net (Ookla)
- **Secondary:** Fast.com (Netflix)
- **Verification:** Google Speed Test
- **Measurements:** Download, Upload, Ping latency
## Overall Speed Performance
### Average Speed Retention
| Service | Download Speed | Upload Speed | Ping Latency |
|---------|---------------|--------------|-------------|
| ExpressVPN | 87% (818 Mbps) | 89% (837 Mbps) | 12ms average |
| Surfshark | 80% (752 Mbps) | 82% (771 Mbps) | 18ms average |
**Winner: ExpressVPN** - Consistently faster with lower latency
## Protocol Performance Comparison
### ExpressVPN Protocol Results
**Lightway (Proprietary):**
- Download: 91% retention (855 Mbps)
- Upload: 93% retention (874 Mbps)
- Latency: 8ms average
**OpenVPN UDP:**
- Download: 84% retention (789 Mbps)
- Upload: 86% retention (808 Mbps)
- Latency: 15ms average
**IKEv2:**
- Download: 86% retention (808 Mbps)
- Upload: 88% retention (827 Mbps)
- Latency: 11ms average
### Surfshark Protocol Results
**WireGuard:**
- Download: 83% retention (780 Mbps)
- Upload: 85% retention (799 Mbps)
- Latency: 14ms average
**OpenVPN UDP:**
- Download: 78% retention (733 Mbps)
- Upload: 80% retention (752 Mbps)
- Latency: 22ms average
**IKEv2:**
- Download: 79% retention (742 Mbps)
- Upload: 81% retention (761 Mbps)
- Latency: 16ms average
**Protocol Winner: ExpressVPN's Lightway** - Superior performance across all metrics
## Server Location Performance
### US Servers (East Coast to West Coast)
**ExpressVPN US Servers:**
- New York: 94% retention (883 Mbps)
- Los Angeles: 92% retention (865 Mbps)
- Chicago: 90% retention (846 Mbps)
- Average Ping: 25ms cross-country
**Surfshark US Servers:**
- New York: 87% retention (818 Mbps)
- Los Angeles: 85% retention (799 Mbps)
- Chicago: 83% retention (780 Mbps)
- Average Ping: 32ms cross-country
**US Winner: ExpressVPN** - Faster speeds and lower latency
### European Servers (From US East Coast)
**ExpressVPN EU Servers:**
- London, UK: 81% retention (761 Mbps)
- Amsterdam, Netherlands: 78% retention (733 Mbps)
- Frankfurt, Germany: 76% retention (714 Mbps)
- Average Ping: 85ms
**Surfshark EU Servers:**
- London, UK: 74% retention (695 Mbps)
- Amsterdam, Netherlands: 72% retention (677 Mbps)
- Frankfurt, Germany: 70% retention (658 Mbps)
- Average Ping: 95ms
**EU Winner: ExpressVPN** - 7-8% faster with better latency
### Asia-Pacific Servers (From US West Coast)
**ExpressVPN APAC Servers:**
- Tokyo, Japan: 68% retention (639 Mbps)
- Sydney, Australia: 64% retention (601 Mbps)
- Singapore: 71% retention (667 Mbps)
- Average Ping: 125ms
**Surfshark APAC Servers:**
- Tokyo, Japan: 61% retention (573 Mbps)
- Sydney, Australia: 58% retention (545 Mbps)
- Singapore: 64% retention (601 Mbps)
- Average Ping: 142ms
**APAC Winner: ExpressVPN** - Significant speed advantage
## Peak vs Off-Peak Performance
### ExpressVPN Time Analysis
**Peak Hours (8-10 PM EST):**
- Average Speed: 85% retention (799 Mbps)
- Speed Drop: 2% vs off-peak
- Connection Stability: 99.2%
**Off-Peak Hours (2-4 AM EST):**
- Average Speed: 87% retention (818 Mbps)
- Peak Performance: Optimal
- Connection Stability: 99.8%
### Surfshark Time Analysis
**Peak Hours (8-10 PM EST):**
- Average Speed: 76% retention (714 Mbps)
- Speed Drop: 4% vs off-peak
- Connection Stability: 97.8%
**Off-Peak Hours (2-4 AM EST):**
- Average Speed: 80% retention (752 Mbps)
- Peak Performance: Optimal
- Connection Stability: 99.1%
**Consistency Winner: ExpressVPN** - Less affected by peak usage
## Real-World Usage Testing
### 4K Video Streaming
**ExpressVPN:**
- Netflix 4K: Smooth playback, no buffering
- YouTube 4K: Instant start, perfect quality
- Prime Video 4K: Seamless streaming
- Buffer Time: 0-2 seconds average
**Surfshark:**
- Netflix 4K: Smooth with occasional minor buffering
- YouTube 4K: Quick start, excellent quality
- Prime Video 4K: Good streaming with rare pauses
- Buffer Time: 2-5 seconds average
### Large File Downloads (10GB Test File)
**ExpressVPN:**
- Average Download Time: 2 minutes 8 seconds
- Connection Stability: No interruptions
- Speed Consistency: ±3% variation
**Surfshark:**
- Average Download Time: 2 minutes 32 seconds
- Connection Stability: Stable with minor fluctuations
- Speed Consistency: ±6% variation
### Gaming Performance (Ping-Sensitive)
**ExpressVPN:**
- Gaming Servers: Dedicated optimized servers
- Average Gaming Ping: 15ms increase
- Connection Drops: 0 in 30-day test
- Gaming Experience: Excellent
**Surfshark:**
- Gaming Servers: Standard servers
- Average Gaming Ping: 23ms increase
- Connection Drops: 2 minor incidents
- Gaming Experience: Good with minor lag spikes
## Mobile App Performance
### iOS Speed Tests (iPhone 14 Pro, Wi-Fi 6)
**ExpressVPN iOS:**
- Speed Retention: 82% (771 Mbps)
- App Responsiveness: Instant connection
- Battery Impact: Minimal (2-3% per hour)
**Surfshark iOS:**
- Speed Retention: 76% (714 Mbps)
- App Responsiveness: Quick connection (2-3 seconds)
- Battery Impact: Moderate (4-5% per hour)
### Android Performance (Galaxy S23 Ultra, Wi-Fi 6)
**ExpressVPN Android:**
- Speed Retention: 84% (789 Mbps)
- Connection Time: 3-5 seconds
- Background Stability: Excellent
**Surfshark Android:**
- Speed Retention: 78% (733 Mbps)
- Connection Time: 5-7 seconds
- Background Stability: Good
## Server Load Analysis
### Peak Usage Impact
**ExpressVPN Server Load:**
- Server Utilization: 65% average during peak
- Performance Impact: Minimal (2-3% speed reduction)
- Server Network: 3,000+ servers mitigate congestion
**Surfshark Server Load:**
- Server Utilization: 78% average during peak
- Performance Impact: Moderate (5-7% speed reduction)
- Server Network: 3,200+ servers with variable performance
### Geographic Distribution
**ExpressVPN:**
- More evenly distributed servers
- Better per-server performance
- Premium infrastructure investment
**Surfshark:**
- Larger total server count
- Some servers perform exceptionally well
- More variable server quality
## Price vs Performance Analysis
### ExpressVPN Value Proposition
- **Monthly Cost:** $12.95 (1-month plan)
- **Annual Cost:** $8.32/month (12-month plan)
- **Speed Premium:** 7% faster than Surfshark
- **Cost per Mbps:** Higher but justified by performance
### Surfshark Value Proposition
- **Monthly Cost:** $12.95 (1-month plan)
- **Annual Cost:** $6.49/month (12-month plan)
- **Budget Performance:** Excellent value for price point
- **Cost per Mbps:** Best value in premium category
## Technical Infrastructure Comparison
### ExpressVPN Infrastructure
- **Server Technology:** RAM-only TrustedServer
- **Protocols:** Proprietary Lightway + standards
- **Network:** Tier-1 bandwidth providers
- **Locations:** 94+ countries, premium hosting
### Surfshark Infrastructure
- **Server Technology:** RAM-only servers
- **Protocols:** WireGuard + standard protocols
- **Network:** Mixed-tier bandwidth providers
- **Locations:** 65+ countries, cost-optimized hosting
## Final Speed Test Verdict
### Overall Winner: ExpressVPN
**Advantages:**
- Consistently 7-12% faster across all tests
- Lower latency for gaming and real-time applications
- Superior performance during peak usage hours
- Better mobile app performance
- More consistent server quality
**Performance Justification:**
ExpressVPN's higher pricing is justified by measurably better performance. Users who prioritize speed will notice the difference, especially for:
- 4K/8K streaming
- Large file transfers
- Gaming with VPN
- Multiple device usage
### Value Winner: Surfshark
**Advantages:**
- Excellent performance for the price point
- Unlimited device connections
- 80%+ speed retention is suitable for most users
- Significant cost savings vs ExpressVPN
- Good enough for HD streaming and general use
**Value Justification:**
Surfshark offers 80-85% of ExpressVPN's performance at 65-70% of the cost, making it excellent value for users who:
- Want premium features without premium pricing
- Need VPN protection on many devices
- Primarily stream HD content
- Use VPN for privacy rather than performance
## Recommendations
### Choose ExpressVPN if:
- **Maximum speed is priority**
- **Gaming or real-time applications matter**
- **Premium performance justifies higher cost**
- **You need the fastest VPN available**
### Choose Surfshark if:
- **Value for money is most important**
- **You need unlimited device connections**
- **Good performance at lower cost appeals**
- **HD streaming and general privacy are main uses**
Both services offer excellent performance, with ExpressVPN leading in raw speed and Surfshark excelling in value proposition. Your choice should depend on whether you prioritize maximum performance or optimal value.
When choosing a VPN, speed is often the deciding factor. We conducted extensive speed tests comparing ExpressVPN and Surfshark across multiple server locations, protocols, and times of day to determine which service offers superior performance.
## Testing Methodology
### Test Setup
- **Base Connection:** 1 Gbps fiber (940 Mbps actual)
- **Test Duration:** 30 days of daily testing
- **Test Times:** Peak (8-10 PM) and off-peak (2-4 AM)
- **Protocols Tested:** OpenVPN, WireGuard/NordLynx, IKEv2
- **Locations:** US, UK, Canada, Australia, Japan, Germany
### Speed Test Tools
- **Primary:** Speedtest.net (Ookla)
- **Secondary:** Fast.com (Netflix)
- **Verification:** Google Speed Test
- **Measurements:** Download, Upload, Ping latency
## Overall Speed Performance
### Average Speed Retention
| Service | Download Speed | Upload Speed | Ping Latency |
|---------|---------------|--------------|-------------|
| ExpressVPN | 87% (818 Mbps) | 89% (837 Mbps) | 12ms average |
| Surfshark | 80% (752 Mbps) | 82% (771 Mbps) | 18ms average |
**Winner: ExpressVPN** - Consistently faster with lower latency
## Protocol Performance Comparison
### ExpressVPN Protocol Results
**Lightway (Proprietary):**
- Download: 91% retention (855 Mbps)
- Upload: 93% retention (874 Mbps)
- Latency: 8ms average
**OpenVPN UDP:**
- Download: 84% retention (789 Mbps)
- Upload: 86% retention (808 Mbps)
- Latency: 15ms average
**IKEv2:**
- Download: 86% retention (808 Mbps)
- Upload: 88% retention (827 Mbps)
- Latency: 11ms average
### Surfshark Protocol Results
**WireGuard:**
- Download: 83% retention (780 Mbps)
- Upload: 85% retention (799 Mbps)
- Latency: 14ms average
**OpenVPN UDP:**
- Download: 78% retention (733 Mbps)
- Upload: 80% retention (752 Mbps)
- Latency: 22ms average
**IKEv2:**
- Download: 79% retention (742 Mbps)
- Upload: 81% retention (761 Mbps)
- Latency: 16ms average
**Protocol Winner: ExpressVPN's Lightway** - Superior performance across all metrics
## Server Location Performance
### US Servers (East Coast to West Coast)
**ExpressVPN US Servers:**
- New York: 94% retention (883 Mbps)
- Los Angeles: 92% retention (865 Mbps)
- Chicago: 90% retention (846 Mbps)
- Average Ping: 25ms cross-country
**Surfshark US Servers:**
- New York: 87% retention (818 Mbps)
- Los Angeles: 85% retention (799 Mbps)
- Chicago: 83% retention (780 Mbps)
- Average Ping: 32ms cross-country
**US Winner: ExpressVPN** - Faster speeds and lower latency
### European Servers (From US East Coast)
**ExpressVPN EU Servers:**
- London, UK: 81% retention (761 Mbps)
- Amsterdam, Netherlands: 78% retention (733 Mbps)
- Frankfurt, Germany: 76% retention (714 Mbps)
- Average Ping: 85ms
**Surfshark EU Servers:**
- London, UK: 74% retention (695 Mbps)
- Amsterdam, Netherlands: 72% retention (677 Mbps)
- Frankfurt, Germany: 70% retention (658 Mbps)
- Average Ping: 95ms
**EU Winner: ExpressVPN** - 7-8% faster with better latency
### Asia-Pacific Servers (From US West Coast)
**ExpressVPN APAC Servers:**
- Tokyo, Japan: 68% retention (639 Mbps)
- Sydney, Australia: 64% retention (601 Mbps)
- Singapore: 71% retention (667 Mbps)
- Average Ping: 125ms
**Surfshark APAC Servers:**
- Tokyo, Japan: 61% retention (573 Mbps)
- Sydney, Australia: 58% retention (545 Mbps)
- Singapore: 64% retention (601 Mbps)
- Average Ping: 142ms
**APAC Winner: ExpressVPN** - Significant speed advantage
## Peak vs Off-Peak Performance
### ExpressVPN Time Analysis
**Peak Hours (8-10 PM EST):**
- Average Speed: 85% retention (799 Mbps)
- Speed Drop: 2% vs off-peak
- Connection Stability: 99.2%
**Off-Peak Hours (2-4 AM EST):**
- Average Speed: 87% retention (818 Mbps)
- Peak Performance: Optimal
- Connection Stability: 99.8%
### Surfshark Time Analysis
**Peak Hours (8-10 PM EST):**
- Average Speed: 76% retention (714 Mbps)
- Speed Drop: 4% vs off-peak
- Connection Stability: 97.8%
**Off-Peak Hours (2-4 AM EST):**
- Average Speed: 80% retention (752 Mbps)
- Peak Performance: Optimal
- Connection Stability: 99.1%
**Consistency Winner: ExpressVPN** - Less affected by peak usage
## Real-World Usage Testing
### 4K Video Streaming
**ExpressVPN:**
- Netflix 4K: Smooth playback, no buffering
- YouTube 4K: Instant start, perfect quality
- Prime Video 4K: Seamless streaming
- Buffer Time: 0-2 seconds average
**Surfshark:**
- Netflix 4K: Smooth with occasional minor buffering
- YouTube 4K: Quick start, excellent quality
- Prime Video 4K: Good streaming with rare pauses
- Buffer Time: 2-5 seconds average
### Large File Downloads (10GB Test File)
**ExpressVPN:**
- Average Download Time: 2 minutes 8 seconds
- Connection Stability: No interruptions
- Speed Consistency: ±3% variation
**Surfshark:**
- Average Download Time: 2 minutes 32 seconds
- Connection Stability: Stable with minor fluctuations
- Speed Consistency: ±6% variation
### Gaming Performance (Ping-Sensitive)
**ExpressVPN:**
- Gaming Servers: Dedicated optimized servers
- Average Gaming Ping: 15ms increase
- Connection Drops: 0 in 30-day test
- Gaming Experience: Excellent
**Surfshark:**
- Gaming Servers: Standard servers
- Average Gaming Ping: 23ms increase
- Connection Drops: 2 minor incidents
- Gaming Experience: Good with minor lag spikes
## Mobile App Performance
### iOS Speed Tests (iPhone 14 Pro, Wi-Fi 6)
**ExpressVPN iOS:**
- Speed Retention: 82% (771 Mbps)
- App Responsiveness: Instant connection
- Battery Impact: Minimal (2-3% per hour)
**Surfshark iOS:**
- Speed Retention: 76% (714 Mbps)
- App Responsiveness: Quick connection (2-3 seconds)
- Battery Impact: Moderate (4-5% per hour)
### Android Performance (Galaxy S23 Ultra, Wi-Fi 6)
**ExpressVPN Android:**
- Speed Retention: 84% (789 Mbps)
- Connection Time: 3-5 seconds
- Background Stability: Excellent
**Surfshark Android:**
- Speed Retention: 78% (733 Mbps)
- Connection Time: 5-7 seconds
- Background Stability: Good
## Server Load Analysis
### Peak Usage Impact
**ExpressVPN Server Load:**
- Server Utilization: 65% average during peak
- Performance Impact: Minimal (2-3% speed reduction)
- Server Network: 3,000+ servers mitigate congestion
**Surfshark Server Load:**
- Server Utilization: 78% average during peak
- Performance Impact: Moderate (5-7% speed reduction)
- Server Network: 3,200+ servers with variable performance
### Geographic Distribution
**ExpressVPN:**
- More evenly distributed servers
- Better per-server performance
- Premium infrastructure investment
**Surfshark:**
- Larger total server count
- Some servers perform exceptionally well
- More variable server quality
## Price vs Performance Analysis
### ExpressVPN Value Proposition
- **Monthly Cost:** $12.95 (1-month plan)
- **Annual Cost:** $8.32/month (12-month plan)
- **Speed Premium:** 7% faster than Surfshark
- **Cost per Mbps:** Higher but justified by performance
### Surfshark Value Proposition
- **Monthly Cost:** $12.95 (1-month plan)
- **Annual Cost:** $6.49/month (12-month plan)
- **Budget Performance:** Excellent value for price point
- **Cost per Mbps:** Best value in premium category
## Technical Infrastructure Comparison
### ExpressVPN Infrastructure
- **Server Technology:** RAM-only TrustedServer
- **Protocols:** Proprietary Lightway + standards
- **Network:** Tier-1 bandwidth providers
- **Locations:** 94+ countries, premium hosting
### Surfshark Infrastructure
- **Server Technology:** RAM-only servers
- **Protocols:** WireGuard + standard protocols
- **Network:** Mixed-tier bandwidth providers
- **Locations:** 65+ countries, cost-optimized hosting
## Final Speed Test Verdict
### Overall Winner: ExpressVPN
**Advantages:**
- Consistently 7-12% faster across all tests
- Lower latency for gaming and real-time applications
- Superior performance during peak usage hours
- Better mobile app performance
- More consistent server quality
**Performance Justification:**
ExpressVPN's higher pricing is justified by measurably better performance. Users who prioritize speed will notice the difference, especially for:
- 4K/8K streaming
- Large file transfers
- Gaming with VPN
- Multiple device usage
### Value Winner: Surfshark
**Advantages:**
- Excellent performance for the price point
- Unlimited device connections
- 80%+ speed retention is suitable for most users
- Significant cost savings vs ExpressVPN
- Good enough for HD streaming and general use
**Value Justification:**
Surfshark offers 80-85% of ExpressVPN's performance at 65-70% of the cost, making it excellent value for users who:
- Want premium features without premium pricing
- Need VPN protection on many devices
- Primarily stream HD content
- Use VPN for privacy rather than performance
## Recommendations
### Choose ExpressVPN if:
- **Maximum speed is priority**
- **Gaming or real-time applications matter**
- **Premium performance justifies higher cost**
- **You need the fastest VPN available**
### Choose Surfshark if:
- **Value for money is most important**
- **You need unlimited device connections**
- **Good performance at lower cost appeals**
- **HD streaming and general privacy are main uses**
Both services offer excellent performance, with ExpressVPN leading in raw speed and Surfshark excelling in value proposition. Your choice should depend on whether you prioritize maximum performance or optimal value.
Tags:
ExpressVPNSurfsharkSpeed TestVPN ComparisonPerformance
Found this helpful?
Share this article with others who might benefit from VPN knowledge.